Nearshore, offshore or in-house
Three ways to staff the same function. This is what actually differs between them, including the cases where nearshore is the wrong answer.
Nearshore outsourcing places your team in a nearby country that shares your working hours; offshore places it far enough away that the days barely overlap; in-house keeps it on your own payroll. For a United States business the practical difference is time and total cost. Honduras runs on Central Time, the same clock as Chicago, so a question asked at four in the afternoon is answered that afternoon. India is 11.5 hours ahead and the Philippines 14, so the same question is answered tomorrow. In-house costs roughly $45,000 to $60,000 a year per person fully loaded; nearshore runs $14,400 to $38,400; offshore can be cheaper still, and that is the trade.
Where the three actually differ
Only the rows that change the decision. Everything the three models have in common is left out.
| What differs | In-house, US | Nearshore, Honduras | Offshore, Asia |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overlap with a US business day | Full | Full. Honduras is on Central Time, the same clock as Chicago or Dallas | Partial. India is 11.5 hours ahead of US Central, the Philippines 14 |
| Fully loaded annual cost, one person | Roughly $45,000 to $60,000 once payroll taxes, benefits, equipment and space are counted | From $14,400 to $38,400, flat and inclusive | Can be lower than nearshore, and often is |
| Spanish as well as English | A premium you recruit and pay for | Standard. Every placement works in both | Rare, and usually a separate team |
| What a question costs you | An answer in minutes | An answer in minutes | An answer tomorrow, unless somebody is working nights |
| Who carries recruitment and replacement | You, plus agency fees | Us, inside the rate, with a 30-day guarantee | Usually the provider, terms vary widely |
| Time from decision to someone working | Commonly 60 days or more | Typically 2 weeks | Comparable to nearshore, sometimes faster at volume |
| Visiting the team | Down the corridor | A direct flight of a few hours from most US hubs | A day of travel each way |
When each one is the right answer
We sell the middle column. These are still the conditions under which the other two beat it, and pretending otherwise would not survive the first call.
In-house wins when
- The work needs someone physically present, with keys, hardware or a signature.
- The role is senior enough that you are buying judgement and relationships, not hours.
- Headcount is small enough that management overhead per person does not matter.
Offshore wins when
- Unit cost is the deciding factor and the work is genuinely asynchronous.
- Volume is high enough to justify running a night shift or a follow-the-sun rota.
- Nobody on the other end of the work needs to speak Spanish.
Nearshore wins when
- The work is conversational: calls, chat, follow-up, anything with a customer waiting.
- A question asked at four in the afternoon has to be answered the same day.
- Some share of your customers, staff or suppliers do business in Spanish.
What you are really buying
Strip out the marketing and the nearshore argument is one sentence: you pay more than the cheapest offshore market, and in exchange the working day overlaps yours end to end.
That matters in proportion to how conversational the work is. A team processing records overnight does not need overlap. A team answering your customers, chasing a retainer or qualifying a lead does, because every hour of gap is an hour the customer is waiting and a handover note standing in for a conversation.
If your work sits on the asynchronous end, offshore is the better buy and we would rather you heard it here than three months into a contract.

Nearshore vs Offshore
The six questions people ask once they have understood the difference.
Not sure which column you are in?
Describe the work on a thirty-minute call. If it belongs offshore or in-house, we will tell you.
Book a Free Consultation